Site icon Capt.S.S.Chaudhari

Bulk Carriers Losses-1 (The problems)

General Constructional Features

Theory of Bulk Carrier Losses
Bulk carriers have one of the highest loss rates of the world merchant fleet. During the period 1990-95 the average age of bulk carriers lost through leaks or disappearance was 18 years. This hinted at a continual decay or overall decay occurring o bulk carriers. This was also foo for thought for the concept of goal based regulations. The age related vessel damage appeared as  a prime contributor to bulk carrier losses. The findings of several research programs support this view by identifying both corrosion and fatigue as weakening the structures of bulk carriers.

1. Deterioration of ships hull / structure through corrosion, fatigue and damage is identified as a principal factor in the loss of many ships carrying cargo in bulk. The cargoes under scanner being the coal and iron ore. There are these two things which happen here:
(i) Failing to identify such deterioration; and
(ii) sudden  and unexpected accident.
Bulk carrier crew may be unaware of the vulnerability of these vessel types. The consequential loss of a ship carrying heavy cargo can be very rapid and possibly mysterious.

2. High Tensile Steel (HTS) is commonly used in bulk carriers to reduce the thickness of the structure, increasing cargo carrying capacity. However, the drawback of HTS is that, when any structure is corroded, the loss of strength occurs far quicker than for mild steel. Therefore, high notch tough steel is used in crucial areas such as the keel, bilge, deck stringer, sheer strakes and top/bottom parts of bulkheads to provide continual strength throughout the vessel’s life.

3. Bulk carriers are known to be more susceptible to structural failure than other similar sized ships, particularly when a hull breach causes water ingress into the cargo holds. Monitoring the structure for any signs of deformation, fatigue or corrosion and applying preventive rather than reactive maintenance is so important. However, despite all these precautions, incidents on bulk carriers causing loss of both life and cargo have caused concern of late, leading to the development of new structural standards for bulk carriers.

4. Association of large machines causing instant, direct damage to various hold parts is like an inherent problem with bulk carriers. The direct damage initiates the process of further deterioration if neglected.

5. In 1990 the IMO issued a circular (MSC/Circ.531) which warned against the risks of shifting cargo and requested Member Governments to implement revised recommendations for trimming cargoes which were included in the 1989 edition of the Code and are intended to minimize sliding failures.

6. Excessive SF BM as the major cause of ship loss. The sudden increase in bulk carrier losses in 1990 and 1991 caused considerable alarm in the shipping industry.  In response, the IMO Assembly adopted Resolution A.713(17) (“Safety of Ships Carrying Dry Bulk Cargoes”) which contains interim measures designed to improve the safety of ships carrying solid bulk cargoes.   The resolution noted that the nature of cargo and ballast operations can subject bulk carriers to severe patterns of bending and sheer forces and also to significant wear.  It referred to the dangers posed by some bulk cargoes through their high density and tendency to shift.

7. Spaces forward of the collision bulkhead are vulnerable in rough seas, in case of most ships in loaded condition, in the event of flooding. Any ingress forward will affect the trim of the ship and reduce freeboard at the bow. Green seas would impact on hatch covers and other fittings that provide weather tightness. Incidents of hatch cover and deck machinery getting uprooted are there on record.

8. Corrosion:
Bulk carrier corrosion rates are highly variable
a. Coal and iron ore cargoes, frequency of cargo loading and ballasting, expected trade routes, ballast ratios and type of coal transported, are the main parameters affecting corrosion rates due to varying levels of chloride, sulphate and acidity produced from various coals.
b. Coal is more corrosive than iron ore due to the presence of chlorine and pyritic sulphur which provide sources for Cl2 and SO4  ions respectively.
c. The time of wetness (TOW) and wear of protective coatings varies for different locations within the vessel, depending on which cargo is loaded.
d. The oxygen content within loaded coal is approximately 20.5%, which is similar to open air.
e. Corrosion is also dependent on the pH of the electrolyte. Coal comprises 50-65% carbon. The electrolytic potential of carbon is 2.1V compared to -0.44V for mild steel. It is therefore a condition favouring the formation of a galvanic cell.

(You may also visit my youtube videos

Exit mobile version